| impegni | 2025-09-18 · NEW:  Appunta · Stampa · Cita: 'Doc 100150' · pdf |
20 Autorità mondiali firmano l'impegno di essere chiari sulla AI - fonte Cnil |
abstract:
"3. Moreover, we recognize that in the current environment surrounding Al development and deployment, data processing has become exceedingly complex.". Ripetono insieme le domande a loro rivolte da tempo per una certezza del diritto oltre la flessibilità. Quindi ? Nessuna decisione. Si ripetono le domande che tutti pongono a loro stessi. In area riservata l'analisi dei temi e dei problemi irrisolti.
Fonte: CnilLink: https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/2025-09/jo
analisi:
......
-
............: .................. . ...... ....'............ ........... (..)
-
................ .. ....... ........ . .......... ... .... ........ .... .......
-
.................. ... ........... .... ....'.......... ..
-
....... .. ........ ...... . ................... ... .'...........
-
....... ... ............ ..... .......... .... (...)
-
............ ......... ..... .... ...... .. ........... ....
-
....... .. ............ . ............. ..... ...... .. .........
-
............ ........ ..... ............ ........ . .......
-
......... ..... .......... ...... . ......... .. ..... ... ...................
-
............. ..... ............ ... ..... ............... ...........
-
-
......... . ............... .........
....... .. ...., ..... . ........
| ......... | ...... | ...... |
|---|---|---|
| .... | ........ ....... ........ | .......... . ....... ......... .. .......... .... .......... . ........... |
| .... | ......... .......-..-...... | ......... ........ .. ....... .......... ..... ............. ... ....... .. |
| .... | ............ ............ ....... | .......... ...... ........ . ........... ... ........ . ........... ... ....... |
| .... | ........... ... ........... | .......... ....... . ............ ... ..... ... ...... ..... ...... ... ...... .. |
| .... | ........ .... ...... ... ........... .... | ........ ........ ...... ... .. ........... ...... ... .... ... ............. .. |
| .... | .......... ...... .. ......... | ....... .. ........... ............ ... .......... ............ .. ...... .. .......... |
| .... | .......... ............ .. | .......... ............ ........ ....... . ....... .................. .. |
| .... | ......... ........... ......... | ...... ..... ......... .......... .... ....... .......... ... ............ ....... |
| .... | .......... ............ ........... | ........... ... ............... .. ..........., .......... ........... . ................ ............. |
| ..... | ... .......... ....... . ....... ............ | ... .......... .. ......... .. ................. . ......... .. .......... .... . ....... |
| ..... | ... ........ .................. ... .... | ....... ........ ............ .................. ..... ...... .. ........... .... ......... |
| ..... | ... ...... .......... ...... | ... ........ ..... ......... ... ....... ....... .. ........ . ... ............ ............. |
| ......... | ........ ...... .... ................ .. .... ........... | .............. .. ...... .. ......... .. ........ ... ....... ....... . .......... .. |
| ......... | .......... ........... | ....... ...... . ........... .. ............. . .. ........ ... .... .. .... ............ |
| ......... | ......... .......... ................. | ........... ..., .........., ......... . ............... ... .......... .. ..... .. .. ....... ..... .. ..... |
| ......... | ........ ........... ........... ... ........ | ........ . .......... .. ........... ..... ...... . ........... ........ .. ........... .... .. |
index:
testo:
Joint statement on building trustworthy data governance frameworks to encourage development of innovative and privacy-protective Al 11 February 2025 1. Artificial intelligence (Al) presents immense opportunities for the benefit of humanity, innovation in science, the economy, and society as a whole. Al also poses significant risks with respect to the protection of fundamental rights such as data protection and privacy, but it also poses risks of discrimination, misinformation and hallucination that are often caused by the inappropriate processing of data. 2. We recognize the need to fully cultivate public trust and harness the transformative benefits Al could bring. We Recall that Al should be developed and deployed in accordance with data protection and privacy rules and other norms. This includes embedding privacy-by-design principles into Al systems from the initial planning stage and implementing robust internal data governance frameworks. These frameworks should incorporate technical and procedural safeguards for effective management and mitigation of risks throughout the entire lifecycle of an Al system. 3. Moreover, we recognize that in the current environment surrounding Al development and deployment, data processing has become exceedingly complex. Indeed: a. It is developed and deployed across many different sectors, including health, public services, public security, human resources, and education; b. It involves a great number of stakeholders scattered all over the world and complex value chains, including dataset creators, model providers, dataset and model hosting platforms, integrators, annotators, system deployers, and end-users; c. It operates at large scale with Al technologies necessitating vast amounts of data that are at the core of these systems; d. It implies complex data processing that poses significant challenges for its control and increases the needs for transparency to foster the protection of privacy and other fundamental rights; and e. It evolves at a very fast pace with major scientific and technological breakthroughs being recorded on a daily basis. 4. Citizens' and businesses' need for answers and legal certainty is therefore increasingly pressing in order to enable the development of Al within trustworthy data governance frameworks. At the same time, the application of rules should provide a sufficient degree of flexibility for various innovative efforts to take place consistently with the protection of privacy and personal data. We recognize therefore the importance of supporting players in the Al ecosystem in their efforts to comply with data protection and privacy rules and help them reconcile innovation with respect for individuals' rights. Highlighting data protection authorities' leading role in shaping data governance to address Al's evolving challenges, we commit to the following: 5. To foster our shared understanding of lawful grounds for processing data in the context of Al training in our respective jurisdictions. Clear standards and requirements should be developed to ensure that Al training data is processed lawfully, whether based on consent, contractual necessity, legitimate interest, or other legal justifications. In doing so, attention should be paid to various relevant factors, including the specific purposes of Al development, the characteristics of the requisite data, the reasonable expectation of data subjects, and associated risk mitigation strategies. 6. To exchange information and establish a shared understanding of proportionate safety measures based on rigorous scientific and evidence-based assessments and tailored to diversity of use cases. The relevance of these measures should be regularly updated to keep pace with evolving Al data processing technologies and practices. 7. To continuously monitor both the technical and societal implications of Al and to leverage the expertise and experience of Data Protection Authorities and other relevant entities, including NGOs, public authorities, academia, and businesses, in Al-related policy matters when possible. 8. To reduce legal uncertainties and secure space for innovation where data processing is essential for the development and deployment of Al. This may include institutional measures, such as regulatory sandboxes, as well as tools for sharing best practices. These measures and tools should be grounded in public trust and be consistent with principles of privacy and data protection. 9. To strengthen our interactions with relevant authorities, including those in charge of competition, consumer protection and intellectual property, to facilitate consistency and foster synergies between different applicable regulatory frameworks to Al systems, tools and applications. Dialogues involving diverse players in the Al ecosystem should also be encouraged. Haksoo Ко Jh Chairperson Personal Information Protection Commission Korea Marie-Laure Denis President Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés France John Edwards Commissioner Information Commissioner's Office United Kingdom che Dale Sunderland Data Protection Commissioner Ireland five Carly Kind privacy Commissioner Office of the Australian Information Commissioner Australia Hielke Hijmans Autorité de protection des données Commissioner Belgium ац Borislav Bozhinov Комисия за защита на личните данни Chairman Bulgaria Zdravko Vukić Philippe Dufresne Office of the privacy Commissioner of Canada privacy Commissioner Canada Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka Director Croatia JijaF Heljä-Tuulia Pihamaа Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto Deputy Commissioner Finland 4.9.h Andreas Hartl Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit Deputy Commissioner Germany Aucreas Harte Ada CHUNG Lai-ling Office of the privacy Commissioner for Personal Data privacy Commissioner for Personal Data Hong Kong, China Ginevra Cerrina Feroni Garante per la protezione dei Dati personali Vice President Pre Cnnt Aleid Wolfsen Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens Chair Netherlands th Michael Webster Office of the privacy Commissioner privacy Commissioner New Zealand Alain Herrmann Commission nationale pour la protection des données Commissioner Luxembourg H Lorenzo Cotino Hueso Agencia Española de Protección de Datos President Spaih Jch Eric Leijonram Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten Director-General Sweden Ken Chongwei YANG Personal Data Protection Bureau Director Macao SAR, China Corsth hist slerd Mirosław Wróblewski Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych President Poland Brle
Download Pdf
Link: https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/2025-09/jo
Testo del 2025-09-18 Fonte: Cnil
Impegni Intelligenza artificiale
