Civile.it
/internet
Osservatorio sul diritto e telecomunicazioni informatiche, a cura del dott. V. Spataro dal 1999, documenti.

Il glossario e' stato letto volte.



Segui via: Email - Telegram
  Dal 1999   spieghiamo il diritto di internet  Store  Caffe20  Glossario  App  Video Demo · Accesso · Iscrizioni    
             

  


Clausole 18.06.2020    Pdf    Appunta    Letti    Post successivo  

Antitrust: Commission opens investigations into Apple's App Store rules

L'antitrust europeo si chiede se le clausole che impongono di usare gli strumenti di pagamento di Apple siano anticoncorrenziali. Un anno per aprire la procedura su un tema ovvio. Tuttavia sembra sia stato limitato agli audiobook e alla musica, cosi' come da richieste.


Ec.europa

 

The European Commission has opened formal antitrust investigations to assess whether Apple's rules for app developers on the distribution of apps via the App Store violate EU competition rules. The investigations concern in particular the mandatory use of Apple's own proprietary in-app purchase system and restrictions on the ability of developers to inform iPhone and iPad users of alternative cheaper purchasing possibilities outside of apps.

The investigations concern the application of these rules to all apps, which compete with Apple's own apps and services in the European Economic Area (EEA). The investigations follow-up on separate complaints by Spotify and by an e-book/audiobook distributor on the impact of the App Store rules on competition in music streaming and^ e-books/audiobooks.

Executive Vice-President Margrethe ^ Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: "Mobile applications have fundamentally changed the way we access content. Apple sets the rules for the distribution of apps to users of iPhones and iPads. It appears that Apple obtained a “gatekeeper” role when it comes to the distribution of apps and content to users of Apple's popular devices. We need to ensure that Apple's rules do not distort competition in markets where Apple is competing with other app developers, for example with its music streaming service Apple Music or with Apple Books. I have therefore decided to take a close look at Apple's App Store rules and their compliance with EU competition rules.”  

 

iPhone and iPad users can only download native (non web-based) apps via the App Store.

The Commission will investigate in particular two restrictions imposed by Apple in its agreements with companies that wish to distribute apps to users of Apple devices:

(i)   The mandatory use of Apple's own proprietary ^ in-app purchase system “IAP” for the distribution of paid digital content. Apple charges app developers a 30% commission on all subscription fees through IAP.

(ii)  Restrictions on the ability of developers to inform users of ^ alternative purchasing possibilities outside of apps. While Apple allows users to consume content such as music, e-books and audiobooks purchased elsewhere (e.g. on the website of the app developer) also in the app, its rules prevent developers from informing users about such purchasing possibilities, which are usually cheaper.

^ The complaints

On 11 March 2019, music streaming provider and competitor of Apple Music, Spotify, filed a complaint about the two rules in Apple's license agreements with developers and the associated App Store Review Guidelines, and their impact on competition for music streaming services.

Following a preliminary investigation the Commission has concerns that Apple's restrictions may distort competition for music streaming services on Apple's devices. Apple's competitors have either decided to disable the in-app subscription possibility altogether or have raised their subscription prices in the app and passed on Apple's fee to consumers. In both cases, they were not allowed to inform users about alternative subscription possibilities outside of the app. The IAP obligation also appears to give Apple full control over the relationship with customers of its competitors subscribing in the app, thus dis-intermediating its competitors from important customer data while Apple may obtain valuable data about the activities and offers of its competitors.

On 5 March 2020, ^ an e-book and audiobook distributor, also filed a complaint against Apple, which competes with the complainant through its Apple Books app. This complaint raises similar concerns to those under investigation in the Spotify case but with regard to the distribution of e-books and audiobooks.

In parallel, today the European Commission has opened a formal antitrust investigation to assess whether Apple's conduct in connection with Apple Pay violates EU competition rules.

^ Next steps

The Commission will investigate the possible impact of Apple's App Store practices in particular on competition in music streaming and^ e-books/audiobooks. These practices may ultimately harm consumers by preventing them from benefiting from greater choice and lower prices.

If proven, the practices under investigation may breach EU competition rules on anticompetitive agreements between companies (Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)) and/or on the abuse of a dominant position (Articles 102 TFEU).

The Commission will carry out its in-depth investigations as a matter of priority. The opening of a formal investigation does not prejudge its outcome.

^ Background on antitrust investigations

Article 101 of the TFEU prohibits anticompetitive agreements and decisions of associations of undertakings that prevent, restrict or distort competition within the EU's Single Market. Article 102 of the TFEU prohibits the abuse of a dominant position. The implementation of these provisions is defined in the Antitrust Regulation (Council Regulation No 1/2003), which can also be applied by the national competition authorities.

Article 11(6) of the Antitrust Regulation provides that the opening of proceedings by the Commission relieves the competition authorities of the Member States of their competence to apply EU competition rules to the practices concerned. Article 16(1) further provides that national courts must avoid adopting decisions that would conflict with a decision contemplated by the Commission in proceedings it has initiated.

The Commission has informed Apple and the competition authorities of the Member States that it has opened proceedings in these cases.

There is no legal deadline for bringing an antitrust investigation to an end. The duration of an antitrust investigation depends on a number of factors, including the complexity of the case, the extent to which the companies concerned cooperate with the Commission and the exercise of the rights of defence.

More information on the investigations will be available on the Commission's competition website, in the public case register under case numbers AT.40437 (Apple – App Store Practices - music streaming) and AT.40652 (Apple – App Store Practices –^ e-books/audiobooks).

18.06.2020 Ec.europa
ec.europa


Micro targeting
AGCOM e telefonia: non si puo' introdurre una spesa dopo la fine dei giga
Clausole vessatorie e approvazione online: il ruolo del Legal Design
EDPB su valutazioni di impatto e sintesi della dodicesima sessione plenaria, importante per la privacy
Google vs CNIL: dimostreremo che il nostro consenso e' raccolto validamente.
Clausole abusive. Rivoluzione dalla Francia.
Ecommerce europeo: Fine dei blocchi nazionali, disposizioni sulle interfacce online e sui pagamenti. Eccetto per il diritto d'autore.
Condizioni legali e servizi di pagamento
Anche la Cassazione sul valore delle clausole vessatorie in condizioni generali via email
Clausole vessatorie in un famoso gioco per smartphone ma presenti ovunque



Segui le novità in materia di Clausole su Civile.it via Telegram
oppure via email: (gratis Info privacy)


Dossier:



dallo store:
visita lo store






La prova del sorpasso pericoloso
adv IusOnDemand




Dal 1999 il diritto di internet. I testi sono degli autori e di IusOnDemand srl p.iva 04446030969 - diritti riservati - Privacy - Cookie - Condizioni d'uso - in 0.018