Con i trattati internazionali si aggira la sovranita' degli Stati. Con questa tesi gli attivisti osteggiano ACTA che la Commissione Europea avrebbe firmato a Tokyo. Sui siti istituzionali nessuna informazione, eccetto su una pagina in polacco che capisco veramente poco.

Ecco alcuni passi del testo integrale (al link indicato):

"i) pirated  copyright  goods means  any  goods  which  are  copies  made
without the consent of the right holder or person duly authorized by the
right holder in the country of production and which are made directly or
indirectly from an article where the making of that copy would have
constituted an infringement of a copyright or a related right under the law
of the country in which the procedures set forth in Chapter II (Legal
Framework for Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights) are invoked;

k) right holder includes a federation or an association having the legal
standing to assert rights in intellectual property; "

Praticamente ogni volta che non c'e' consenso.

"art.8: 1.  Each  Party  shall  provide  that,  in  civil  judicial  proceedings  concerning  the
enforcement of intellectual property rights, its judicial authorities have the authority to
issue an order against a party to desist from an infringement, and inter alia, an order to
that  party  or,  where  appropriate,  to  a  third  party  over  whom  the  relevant  judicial
authority exercises jurisdiction, to prevent goods that involve the infringement of an
intellectual property right from entering into the channels of commerce.  "

Quantificazione dei danni:

"Art. 9.: 1.  Each  Party  shall  provide  that,  in  civil  judicial  proceedings  concerning  the
enforcement of intellectual property rights, its judicial authorities have the authority to
order the infringer who, knowingly or with reasonable grounds to know, engaged in
infringing activity to pay the right holder damages adequate to compensate for the
injury the right holder has suffered as a result of the infringement.  In determining the
amount of damages for infringement of intellectual property rights, a Party’s judicial
authorities shall have the authority to consider, inter alia, any legitimate measure of
value the right holder submits, which may include lost profits, the value of the infringed
goods or services measured by the market price, or the suggested retail price. 
 
2.  At  least  in  cases  of  copyright  or  related  rights  infringement  and  trademark
counterfeiting, each Party shall provide that, in civil judicial proceedings, its judicial
authorities have the authority to order the infringer to pay the right holder the infringer’s
profits that are attributable to the infringement.  A Party may presume those profits to
be the amount of damages referred to in paragraph 1. "

E cosi' via.